Cybersecurity Mobile Policy Privacy Scooters. Phones Laptops Headphones Cameras. Tablets Smartwatches Speakers Drones. Accessories Buying Guides How-tos Deals. Health Energy Environment. YouTube Instagram Adobe. Kickstarter Tumblr Art Club. Film TV Games. Fortnite Game of Thrones Books. Comics Music. Once the question is resolved, you cannot make changes or delete your answer. Questions, answers, comments, or nicknames can be removed at any time if they violate the Yahoo Answers Community Guidelines.
Please see Yahoo Answers Help if you have questions about this service. Yahoo Privacy Policy in Other Languages. Yahoo Mobile. In fact, the popularity of YA continued to soar through the late s and growth continued to exceed all expectations. Those are wild numbers and truly show just how much value the internet community was getting from the platform.
There is a feeling of trust when getting advice from other people. The more you know the person, the more you trust in the advice and counsel you receive.
Posting your answer to an online web forum where anonymity is a protected asset can break down that trust barrier beyond repair. A fine measure but one that requires several other triangulation points before it begins to tackle the problem of establishing trust. One of the things you did not get with YA was any concept of identity. While you did get answers from other human beings, you did not know who those human beings were, what their credentials were, or how their experiences prepared them to give you credible advice.
YA gave all users the ability to both ask and answer questions anonymously or with pseudonyms. In the successful versions of YA you had people on the other end of your post who thought about your question, applied their own human reasoning, their powers of empathy, and their ability to put all of this together into a single and comprehensive post. This was the value of Yahoo Answers: to know you were getting an answer or answers from other people who had been in your shoes and walked the path you were now walking.
That gave you comfort, solace and confidence that the information you were getting was dependable and trustworthy. Unfortunately, identity is a key concept to any exchange of trustworthy and reliable information.
You can go back and look at their previous answers to gain more confidence, but that requires time and manual effort. Quora saw the failures in identity from platforms like YA and Ask Jeeves and required that people register with their real names because of this. But again, time is precious and adding burden to the consumers of your system eventually fails when fast, reliable knowledge exchange is the end goal.
Enter the world of reputation. They made the entire system operate and measure user activity behind the scenes. While YA was measuring each and every interaction a user had with the website, they did not expose critical metrics from those measurements that were invaluable to showing transactional experience on the platform.
How do humans typically build interpersonal trust in each other? They do this through a series of interactions or transactions. Those transactions can be verbal, visual or crowdsourced. The more I learn about a person, the more information I have to glean the types of value I can get from a relationship. Verbal transactions are simply conversations. The more I talk to someone, the more I understand their areas of interest, the topics they are an expert in, and their personal and professional backgrounds.
Each conversation is a transaction I subconsciously use to evaluate their credentials. Visual transactions occur each and every day in our lives. If I need help planting and maintaining my garden and my next door neighbor has a gorgeous garden that seems to bloom multiple times during the course of the year, I can trust they know what they are talking about.
In many ways, what is put on these platforms today represents a significant part of our cultural heritage, however banal it may seem in the present. What happens with platform data in the long run will determine what historians and users themselves can look back on — messages from friends, pictures of your children, political discussions.
The afterlife of this data when a platform closes, however, is largely decided by the holding company, not the users who invested their time in the platform. Typically, once user engagement drops off and the remnants are mined for final insights about users, the content becomes rapidly disposable.
Proper and ethical archiving is rarely a priority. When I heard that Yahoo! Even websites that are technically still accessible have lost or deleted huge swaths of user data. In , for instance, the largely abandoned MySpace announced that it had lost an estimated 50 million songs and a huge amount of user content uploaded over a dozen years in a botched server migration. Some dying sites have been partially archived by nonprofit organizations like the Internet Archive or volunteer groups like the Archive Team.
Still, other sites have disappeared largely into the ether. Indeed, platforms are more difficult to archive than the public web, as they are often locked behind password-protected accounts, have technical configurations that are more difficult to save, or are held by larger companies that remain skittish about having their content preserved by another entity.
Yet the digital past is also marked by the threat of scarcity: Data can be deleted in an instant. This is certainly true for online platforms, which can delete millions of user accounts and years of user investment by shutting off a few servers. Hard drive failure, file format obsolescence, and software updates can cause data loss, too.
0コメント