This small demarcation has also formed the basis of conservation and preservation philosophies. Many times the definitions can also used in an overlapped manner. Conservation deals with the careful use of entities, so that they are not wasted or lost. It the wise use of natural resources to benefit the greatest numbers of people, for the longest time.
Prae- is the archaic variant of the prefix pre- which means before, earlier or prior to. Difference between Preservation and Conservation. Key Difference: Preservation and Conservation, both words deal with protection of objects. Generally, preservation deals with keeping an object safe from any form of damage or destruction.
It aims at keeping the object intact; without change. He suggested that humans should leave the National Parks alone entirely. This would allow nature to take its course and let biodiversity flourish in the region. The conflict eventually ended when President Roosevelt agreed-upon conservation as the best practice to protect the environment and sustaining the economy at the same time.
Pinchot ended up serving as the head of the US Forest Service. Today, the organization works to protect more than million acres of forests and grasslands across the US. He remained adamant that the federal lands should not be used for any recreational or industrial practices and had some influential government officials in his favor as well.
Consequently, about million acres of forests and grasslands across the US are managed under the preservationist movement. Today, we know these places as our beloved National Parks managed by the National Park Service organization.
Furthermore, the US Forest Service constructed various research labs inside the woods in states like Wisconsin and Madison. However, the dual approach creates a beneficial balance for the US citizens. Conservation created jobs and helped generate revenue for business owners, while preservation gave us places to enjoy wildlife in its original form and secure biodiversity in the region.
Mainly, the difference lies in the approach and the objectives, while the ultimate aim for protecting the environment remains constant. According to the Cambridge Dictionary , natural conservation means to protect plants, animals, and natural areas from damage produced by human activity. As a contrast, the US dictionary states the meaning of conservation as responsible use of natural materials including fuel, water, and wood. Both definitions clearly explain that while conservation aims to protect the environment and reduce practices that damage it, it also allows the use of natural resources at a sustainable level.
The term preservation in the Cambridge Dictionary is described as keeping something in its original form and preventing it from any damage or degradation.
However, the definition does not provide any examples of environmental preservation as a secondary definition. Similarly, the US definition also describes preservation as a means of protecting an object or area from destruction and damage. Moreover, it emphasizes the protection of historical artifacts and antiquities rather than preserving the environment.
Although the definitions show that conservation and preservation have slightly different meanings, they are both colloquially used as a reference to environmental protection. However, while conservation is abundantly used for the purpose, preservation is colloquially used for other purposes as well. On the other hand, preservation is linked to various aspects, including architecture, arts, mathematics, and heritage. Attributing to the definitions, it does seem that conservation plays a more essential role in environmental protection as compared to preservation.
Despite the long-standing argument about the effectiveness of conservation vs preservation, both concepts are equally important to balance the overall approach. When it comes to conservation, the only aspect preservationists argue upon is that the use of natural areas should be minimized to little or none. While complete restriction seems like a great idea to let nature takes its course, limited human intervention is critical as well.
You see, the ecosystem as a whole functions in its ideal state only when every living thing in the food web is thriving on its own. This means, based on conservationist thoughts; we can use the bounties of nature however much we need, without being invasive with our demands.
Through this concept, human beings can find ways to conduct their actions responsibly. Ultimately, this led to research and development that helped using the resources without obstructing themselves from everything nature has to offer.
On the other hand, preservation is a means to use nature without controlling it in any way. This does not mean that preservationists rule out the use of nature entirely.
By ensuring that resources are taken out of the environment at a sustainable rate, conservation programs help humanity continue to exist and grow. Preservationists, on the other hand, often see wild nature as having value in and of itself, not only when it can help us humans.
Some justify this on religious or spiritual grounds while others think that nature is more beautiful when we leave it alone or that we stop living in harmony with nature when we control it heavily. For those interested in reading more about preservation, check out the writings of John Muir or Bill McKibben. Name required. Email required. Please note: comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment. Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. Written by : Celine.
User assumes all risk of use, damage, or injury. You agree that we have no liability for any damages. Summary: 1. Author Recent Posts. Latest posts by Celine see all. Help us improve.
0コメント