Various video processing features include an array of built-in and customizable filters and functions to enhance your videos through a variety of ways. The main advantages of using Final Cut Pro include: the possibility of simultaneous recording of many video clips at once, the opportunity to trim and split long clips, the opportunity to preview recorded footage in real time, the possibility of making complex transitions, and the availability of a number of customizations and shortcuts for the editors.
One of the main advantages of Final Cut Pro is that it has a comprehensive set of photo retouching tools. This is one of the biggest selling factors because even the amateur video editor can improve their videos.
Other features of Final Cut Pro include a wide array of effects, time code synchronization, etc. With Avid Media Composer you can easily begin creating your work without having to understand complex video editing features, while still completing your project in record time. A lot of people might have heard of the Final Cut Pro, but not many know it can be used in addition to standard software like Sony Vegas, Adobe Premiere and so forth.
Non-destructive editing process Color coding tools 2D and 3D titles Green screen effects Creative transitions. Pinnacle Studio Pro vs iMovie. DaVinci Resolve vs iMovie. OpenShot vs Premiere. Compare with Final Cut Pro. Compare with Fastreel. Compare with EasyMovie. Compare with Movavi Video Converter. Compare with StoryXpress. Compare with Wondershare DemoCreator. Compare with Filmora. Popular Avid Media Composer Alternatives.
Product Name. Nero Video Alternatives 9. Adobe Premiere Elements Alternatives 8. VirtualDub Alternatives 8. Filmage Screen Alternatives 8. Final Cut Pro offers a single enterprise pricing license for all users. Learn more about Final Cut Pro pricing.
No information available. Final Cut Pro is a professional video editing application for macOS users. Final Cut Pro Comparisons. Compare with Blender. Popular Final Cut Pro Alternatives. Who the hell wants that? Bottom line you do allot of lassoing in Avid. If you are not in segment mode you are lassoing transitions in order to go into slip, slide or trim mode and if you are in segment mode you are selecting entire clips to manipulate and if it was always in segment mode it would not know what to select and therefore you would not be able to lasso transitions and you would actually have to select tools like in Final Cut Pro which is far less intuitive than just a drag of the mouse.
As far as deleting something in the bin. Select it and hit delete. Now you do not want to rapidly delete something. That is not cool. You want the option window that avid gives you. It gives you the opportunity to delete the audio or video or both. Also it can allow you to delete just the clip or just the media or both.
And there is no reason to want to do this if you learn way avid trims, slides and slips. And remember, if you insist on working the same way you learned than a lasso in Avid is the same as a click in FCP. And like I said above, trying to make one piece of software behave like another probably means you are too rigid minded to be a good storyteller, at least when dealing with verite based material. I could go on with all of the things that Avid can do that Final Cut Pro cannot but that would be an essay unto itself.
I am trying to answer your questions only. Bottom line. There are only two kinds of Avid editors. The English language is the hardest in the owlrd to learn but the most powerful. See any parallels? Also I should say that I have been editing for twenty years and have edited probably over one hundred hours of television on Avid and about thirty on final cut pro.
I know everything there is to know about both and have no preference. But I also know wassup with the differences …. Both platforms are extremely valuable in capable hands. Unfortunately very few people make use of this great tool. Run and gun guerrilla style film making. I recently was called in on a project using a mac computer and FCP started January So the question is… I am now about to buy my own editing system have been hired out for up unti now.
Then, what do I do about digitizing. For me the AVID trim edit mode works terrific. It is very intuitive, clearly set up on the screen allowing accurate viewing the edit. As many have noted, bottom line is they are both workable and quality NL edit systems. Not sure if Avid supports an iMac or not.
But on both you will be limited to a firewire interface. Go with a Mac Pro yep, they are expensive as they are a workhorse machine. But the flip side for many is how easy you can click and drag and trim directly in the FCP timeline.
I have both and use both depending on the job. David, while Scott is right that the tower is a far more professional piece of equipment however not everyone has an unlimited budget. I own a Mac Pro tower and an iMac I purchased the iMac first and added the tower when I could afford it.
The iMAC. The real upside to the iMac is the Monitor. I am guessing that you wont have a 3k broadcast HD monitor for color correction so a Spyder3 and the iMac monitor will provide wonderfully accurate results. Bottom line is your clients will not know the difference in the end result and if digitizing is a concern pick up an AJA IO SD on ebay for like bucks..
My advice on that is back up back up back up. Just thought I would lend my two cents maybe you do have an unlimited budget if so go for the dream machine…. AVID still rules the film orginated roost with the great metadata control … read the issues that murch had on cold mountain with syncing. To be honest I have found as with any image based thing the choices are endless. Photoshop is not the be all and end all remember!
You choose the one that suits. For stuff I shoot in film that is silverfast with PS as a quick retoucher and spotter. Once the technology is transparent, that is where your talent comes through. A feature can as easily be assembled on an imac with iMovie yes it has been done as with an AVID full on maxed out system with enough outboard gear as you can muster, but the two could be exactly the same if the editor is not creative enough to breath life into the footage.
These have been invaluable to me as well. AVID dominates in every creative aspect. I reluctantly agreed to allow a feature film to stay on FCP; big mistake. FCP is immeasurably more costly if creativity, making changes, and efficiency are your priorities.
The entire Avid vs. FCP is literally an Academic discussion.
0コメント